Legal Opinion
Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 1926No. 16192PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The parties to this controversy will be designated plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared 2n the trial court.
The record is voluminous, but the material facts necessary to be stated in order to determine the questions raised for consideration are as follows: During the year 1921 a number of suits were filed by different persons and companies against the Ryan Cotton Oil Company. One of these suits was filed by the Oklahoma National Bank of Chickasha et al., No. 3725, in the district court of Jefferson county. In said cause an application was made for the appointment of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Price Et Ux. v. Citizens State Bank of MediapolisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Folsom v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- First National Bank of Tulsa v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Chapman v. Schiller, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Mideke Supply Co. v. Ryan Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Woolley v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943