Legal Opinion
Goodall Co. v. Sartin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1944No. Nos. 9431, 9432PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The Goodall Company has appealed from judgments entered on the verdicts of a jury for $2,000 damages awarded Ruby E. Sartin for personal injuries and $500 damages awarded her husband, William Sartin, for loss of her services and consortium. Appellant avers that the District Court erroneously declined to grant its motion for directed verdicts made upon the conclusion of the introduction of evidence by appellees in the two cases, which were tried together, and erroneously declined to grant the same motion renewed when all the evidence had been received.
Pursuant to Civil…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. FollettTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. CampagnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Albert v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charles C. Fowkes v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Banks v. Associated Indemnity CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Hinton v. Dixie Ohio Exp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Seaton v. SeatonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.