Legal Opinion
Frankina v. Salpietro
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of contract brought in the District Court to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The declaration contains two counts for the same cause of action. The first count alleges an express contract by which the amount of the commission was fixed. The second count is on a quantum meruit.
The following requests for rulings made by the defendant were refused: “1. On all the evidence the plaintiff is not *294entitled to recover on the first count of his declaration. 2. On all the evidence, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover on the second count of his declaration. 3. For the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Kaufmann v. SydemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Veasey v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Buono v. CodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stern v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- John T. Burns & Sons Inc. v. HandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Bartlett v. KeithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Driscoll v. BunarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Gaynor v. LaverdureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.