Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Musselman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 5, 2017No. 13-14250Published

1ConcurrenceGilman, Circuit Judge

I write separately because I respectfully disagree with my learned colleague Judge Tjoflat, whose concurring opinion questions the propriety of using a declaratory-judgment action as a means of determining the scope of the settlement agreements in this case. His assertion that “[ajllowing a declaratory judgment to issue for these purposes would significantly defang the injunction as a remedy, which would work a *833serious ham on the rule of law and the integrity of the judiciary” (Tjoflat Op. at 1) finds no support in the text of the Declaratory Judgment Act, the caselaw of this or any other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Thomas v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API