Rotman v. White
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
The issue in this case is whether the defendants, Robert E. and Shirley A. White, have acquired prescriptive rights to continue their use of a forty-five year old sewer line which runs from their house, under the front lawn of the property owned by the plaintiff, and connects to the city of Newton’s (city’s) sewer line. The Appellate Division affirmed a District Court judgment, entered after a bench trial, upon a finding that *587the defendants had failed to satisfy their burden of proving a prescriptive easement and were liable for trespass. We reverse.
Facts. The trial judge made the following…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Truc v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Tinker v. BesselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Boothroyd v. BogartzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barnett v. MyerowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Martha's Vineyard Land Bank Comm'n v. TaylorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Amy Talboy v. Martha DukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
- Gentili v. SturbridgeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Ho v. Winchester Boat ClubMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.