Legal Opinion

Tinker v. Bessel

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 11, 1912PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from interfering with her use of a certain spring of water. The *75plaintiff claims ownership of the spring as successor in title to Ira A. Brewer, to whom Gilbert D. Northrup, the defendants’ predecessor in title, in 1851, being then owner of both estates, conveyed an acre of land by a deed which contained this language: “The said Brewer is to have with said acre a spring of water northeast of said land near an apple tree, with the right to bring it on to said premises.” The case comes before us on appeal from a final decree * in favor of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Kennebeck Purchase v. SpringerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Owen v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. King v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Davis v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Ottavia v. SavareseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. LaChance v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API