Legal Opinion

Bethea v. Philadelphia AFL-CIO Hospital Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the qualifications for a medical expert under the MCARE Act 1 must be met when a medical malpractice claim was filed prior to enactment of the Act, but the expert’s testimony was heard after enactment. We hold that the MCARE Act does apply and so affirm.

¶ 2 Appellant-plaintiff, who is now deceased, brought an action in negligence against John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, two physicians and a podiatrist, stemming from care received upon her hospitalization in January, 1999. At the time of her hospitalization, decedent was eighty-eight…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Morabito's Auto Sales v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Wexler v. HechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Joyce v. Boulevard Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Center, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In re R.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vicari v. SpiegelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Warren v. FolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Wexler v. HechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Anderson v. McAfoosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Cimino v. Valley Family MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API