Bethea v. Philadelphia AFL-CIO Hospital Ass'n
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the qualifications for a medical expert under the MCARE Act 1 must be met when a medical malpractice claim was filed prior to enactment of the Act, but the expert’s testimony was heard after enactment. We hold that the MCARE Act does apply and so affirm.
¶ 2 Appellant-plaintiff, who is now deceased, brought an action in negligence against John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, two physicians and a podiatrist, stemming from care received upon her hospitalization in January, 1999. At the time of her hospitalization, decedent was eighty-eight…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Morabito's Auto Sales v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Wexler v. HechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Joyce v. Boulevard Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Center, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In re R.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vicari v. SpiegelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Warren v. FolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wexler v. HechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Anderson v. McAfoosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cimino v. Valley Family MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.