Commonwealth v. Klucher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
The sole question before us in this appeal is whether or not so-called “pin ball games” are within the purview of the Mercantile Tax Act of May 25, 1907, P. L. 244.
By a stipulation filed the case was tried without a jury and the facts agreed upon. Defendant conducts a drug and confectionery store in the City of Harrisburg, where he sells candies, tobacco, ice cream, etc. He permitted a glass encased playing board standing on four legs, about five feet long and two and one-half feet wide to be installed in his store. This device is described in the opinion of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MescallSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Grissell v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- State v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- City of Fort Worth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Pepple v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.