Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Klucher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1937No. Appeal, 7PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The sole question before us in this appeal is whether or not so-called “pin ball games” are within the purview of the Mercantile Tax Act of May 25, 1907, P. L. 244.

By a stipulation filed the case was tried without a jury and the facts agreed upon. Defendant conducts a drug and confectionery store in the City of Harrisburg, where he sells candies, tobacco, ice cream, etc. He permitted a glass encased playing board standing on four legs, about five feet long and two and one-half feet wide to be installed in his store. This device is described in the opinion of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MescallSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Grissell v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  3. State v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. City of Fort Worth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Pepple v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API