Legal Opinion

Sams v. Hotel Raleigh, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

The duty imposed upon owners or lessors of buildings to employees and invitees with respect to steps is discussed and pronounced in Farrell v. Thomas & Howard Co., 204 N. C., 631; Batson v. Laundry, ante, 93, and Bohannon, v. Stores Co., 197 N. C., 755, 150 S. E., 356.

In order to establish a breach of duty so imposed the injured party must offer evidence tending to show (a) defective or negligent construction or maintenance; (b) express or implied notice of such defects. Blevins v. Cotton Mills, 150 N. C., 493, 64 S. E., 428; Orr v. Rumbough, 172 N. C., 754, 90 S. E., 911; Craver v. Cotton…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dorsett v. Clement-Ross Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Blevins v. Erwin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Bohannon Ex Rel. Bohannon v. Leonard-Fitzpatrick-Mueller Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Conard v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Craver v. Franklin Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Emerson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API