Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Meter v. Darien Park District

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2003No. 90541 RelPublished

1DissentJustice Fitzgerald

Though the majority holds that the trial court “improperly dismissed” the plaintiffs’ claims (207 Ill. 2d at 367), it does not answer the question presented by this case: namely, whether the municipal defendants are entitled to immunity under section 2 — 201 of the Tort Immunity Act for their park-planning decisions. Instead, without any invitation from the parties, the majority transforms this case from an immunity case into a pleading case, stretching to do procedurally what it could not do substantively — remand to give the plaintiffs another day in court. While I applaud the majority’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hampton v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API