Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Geismar v. Geismar
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1945PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This habeas corpus proceeding is a'distressing contest between parents over the custody of their two children. *899Each parent charges that the other is unfit to be entrusted with custody.
The children are Phillipe, a boy nine years old, and Anne, a girl of eight. The father is thirty-four, the mother, younger. The parents are separated, but not divorced. The children were with their mother in Canada when the father surreptitiously contrived their removal into the United States. Inasmuch as all parties are now within the jurisdiction of this court, the mother instituted this proceeding to wrest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People ex rel. Glendening v. GlendeningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- People ex rel. Sternberger v. SternbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Horner v. HornerNew York Family Court · 1944
- People ex rel. MacAlpine v. MacAlpineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- People ex rel. Heller v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- "Lola Almandares" v. "Diego Almandares"New York Family Court · 1946
- Schacht v. SchachtNew York Family Court · 1946
- Rodolfo "CC" v. Susan "CC"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Hahn v. FalceNew York City Family Court · 1968
- Horner v. HornerNew York Family Court · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.