Legal Opinion
Moses v. Moses
New York Family Court
Decided November 29, 1948PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.
At the conclusion of an extended hearing on October 11, 1948, attended by petitioner in person and her brother, B. S., and by respondent’s brother-in-law, A. 0., as attorney in fact, decision was reserved pending a restudy of the voluminous file and the preparation of this memorandum explanatory of my final conclusion that the proceeding should be now marked “ Reserved Generally ” under Family Court Rule XXIV (Bender’s Court Rules [1st ed.], p. 371), which provides (insofar as pertinent): „
“(a) There may be marked 1 Reserved Generally ’ any proceeding in which: * * *
“(2) As the result of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Coe v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Laumeier v. . LaumeierNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Primavera v. PrimaveraNew York Family Court · 1949
- Dee v. DeeNew York Family Court · 1957
- Frances B. v. Robert B.New York Family Court · 1971
- Hughes v. HughesNew York City Family Court · 1968
- White v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.