Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Murphy and Albert Mendes
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 10, 1967No. 331, Docket 30907PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Jude:
The appellants, Daniel Murphy and Albert Mendes, were respectively the financial secretary and business agent of a local union of the International Association of Bridge, Structural and Orna* mental Ironworkers, AFL-CIO. They were found guilty by a jury of having willfully violated § 302 of the Taft Hartley Act 1 (29 U.S.C. § 186) by receiving payments 2 of money from four employers who were engaged in the business of fabricating and erecting iron and and steel structures and whose employees were members of the local union. Both appeal from the judgments of conviction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Max Greenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Ciro Michael CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. John J. Houlihan and Martin LegereCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. StrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Gaetano ModicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Peter SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Browder v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Noel Maxwell, William Adams, John Henry Purry, Clarence White and Leonard R. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Alex DibrizziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.