United States v. Gaetano Modica
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal — like far too many reaching this Court — centers on improper statements made by a prosecutor in his summation to a jury. Such misconduct has gone largely unremedied, for appellate courts are understandably reluctant to reverse convictions merely to discipline prosecutors. This case, too, is one in which the prosecutor’s improper remarks do not warrant reversal of the conviction. The time has come, however, to explore possible sanctions for prosecutorial misconduct other than reversing convictions. We believe that alternative sanctions can and should be fashioned, and that an…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.