Legal Opinion

United States v. Gaetano Modica

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 30, 1981No. 1025, Docket 80-1482PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal — like far too many reaching this Court — centers on improper statements made by a prosecutor in his summation to a jury. Such misconduct has gone largely unremedied, for appellate courts are understandably reluctant to reverse convictions merely to discipline prosecutors. This case, too, is one in which the prosecutor’s improper remarks do not warrant reversal of the conviction. The time has come, however, to explore possible sanctions for prosecutorial misconduct other than reversing convictions. We believe that alternative sanctions can and should be fashioned, and that an…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API