Legal Opinion
Tru Urban Renewal Corp. v. City of Newark
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided March 26, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRABTREE, J.T.C.
Both parties move for summary judgment in these consolidated local property tax cases involving plaintiff’s claim for exemption under the Urban Renewal Corporation and Association Law of 1961, L. 1961, c. 40, N.J.S.A. 40:55C-40 et seq., as amended, sometimes referred to as the Fox-Lance Law.
For reasons hereinafter stated, plaintiff’s motion will be denied and defendant’s motion will be granted on the exemption issue, leaving the valuation issue for trial.
Procedurally, plaintiff appeals from county board judgments entered on December 22, 1987 affirming (1) an omitted-added…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Princeton University Press v. Borough of PrincetonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Town of Bloomfield v. Academy of Med. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- B.P.U.M. Development & Urban Renewal Corp. v. City of CamdenNew Jersey Tax Court · 1988
- Morris Township v. LF AssociatesNew Jersey Tax Court · 1988
- B.P.U.M. Development & Urban Renewal Corp. v. City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000
- NBCP Urban Renewal Partnership v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
- Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
- Jet Urban Renewal Corp. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996