Legal Opinion

NBCP Urban Renewal Partnership v. City of Newark

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMALL, J.T.C.

The plaintiff, NBCP Urban Renewal Partnership, seeks a declaratory judgment determining the amount of the annual service charge in-lieu-of taxes owed by the plaintiff to the defendant, City of Newark, as well as a refund of excess payments made pursuant to the Urban Renewal Corporation and Association Law of 1961 (the Fox-Lance Act). N.J.S.A. 40:55C-40 to -76.1 The matter is before me on plaintiffs motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. R. 4:46.

*63The parties agree that the annual service charge in-lieu-of taxes should be two percent of total project cost, but…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Tessmar v. GrosnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. City of Clifton v. Passaic County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. NBCP Urban Renewal Partnership v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Tiffany Manor Associates, L.P. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999
  4. DiCarlo v. St Mary HospCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API