Legal Opinion
Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey City
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided December 5, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUSKIN, J.T.C.
Plaintiff, Town of Secaucus, challenges property tax exemptions for tax years 1998 and 1999 granted under the Fox-Lance Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55C-40 to -76, by the City of Jersey City to defendant 101 Hudson Street Associates (properly named 101 Hudson Urban Renewal Associates and hereinafter referred to as “Hudson Urban Renewal”) with respect to a forty story office building and related improvements located at 101 Hudson Street, Jersey City (the “Project”). Plaintiff contends that the Project did not qualify for exemption during the years under appeal for the following reasons:
1.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Cavuoti v. New Jersey Transit Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMahon v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003