Legal Opinion

Guynn v. Guynn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 10, 1964No. 5-3146PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

This is a partition proceeding in which the Chancellor awarded appellee’s attorney a fee, taxing it as part of the costs. On appeal appellants contend for reversal that this litigation is an adversary proceeding and, therefore, the court erred in assessing an attorney’s fee as costs.

The appellant, George Guynn, Sr., the appellee, Beth Guynn, and Hugh Guynn upon the death of their father in 1947 were his sole heirs at law. Thus, as tenants in common, each owned an undivided one-third interest in the five-acre homestead. In August, 1961, Hugh and his wife conveyed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Ramey v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Warren v. KlappenbachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Hendrickson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Reagan v. RiversSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API