Ramey v. Bass
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The only question presented by this appeal is whether, in a partition suit, the court should have allowed the attorney for plaintiffs an attorney’s fee and taxed it as costs against all the interested parties to the action, as authorized under § 10531 of Pope’s Digest. This section provides: “Hereafter in all suits in any of the courts of this State for partition of lands when a judgment is rendered for partition, it shall be lawful for the court rendering such judgment or decree to allow a reasonable fee to the attorney bringing such suit, which attorney’s fee shall be taxed as part of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. EmerickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Lewis v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Warren v. KlappenbachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- McElhaney v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Reagan v. RiversSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Guynn v. GuynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964