Legal Opinion

Ramey v. Bass

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 20, 1947No. 4-8046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether, in a partition suit, the court should have allowed the attorney for plaintiffs an attorney’s fee and taxed it as costs against all the interested parties to the action, as authorized under § 10531 of Pope’s Digest. This section provides: “Hereafter in all suits in any of the courts of this State for partition of lands when a judgment is rendered for partition, it shall be lawful for the court rendering such judgment or decree to allow a reasonable fee to the attorney bringing such suit, which attorney’s fee shall be taxed as part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EmerickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Lewis v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Warren v. KlappenbachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. McElhaney v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Reagan v. RiversSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Guynn v. GuynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API