Legal Opinion

Hendrickson v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1963No. 5-3015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

The issue is whether appellee, Floyce Duncan, shall be required to pay part of the fee for the attorney employed by the appellant, Hendrickson, to take the necessary legal steps to partition 117.90 acres of land. Appellant owns 74/144, appellee owns 60/144, and others own 10/144 of the property. The chancellor held that the proceeding is adversary and that, therefore, appellee is not liable for a pro rata part of the fee for the attorney employed to prosecute the partition proceeding.

Hendrickson has appealed.

The action was instituted by appellant, Hendrickson,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warren v. KlappenbachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Guynn v. GuynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Swinson v. JarrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API