Legal Opinion
Ultra Sucro Co. v. Illinois Water Treatment Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
By this motion defendant seeks an order pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C. vacating the service of summons and complaint and dismissing this action for want of jurisdiction over the defendant, or in the alternative seeks an order pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) transferring the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
The underlying action is based on plaintiff’s allegations that the defendant corporation wrongfully appropriated, used and disclosed plaintiff’s trade secrets…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Beverly Beja v. Willa J. Jahangiri, Robert L. Guy and Carlton E. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fiorenza v. United States Steel International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- De Luxe Game Corp. v. Wonder Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.