Legal Opinion

Charbonneau v. Norton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 9, 1931No. Gen. No. 35,140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

In an action on contract for money claimed to be due for the support, maintenance and education of defendant’s infant children, Dorothy Norton and Helen Wray Norton, there was a trial by the court, a finding for plaintiff in the sum of $125, with judgment thereon, from which plaintiff has perfected this appeal, claiming that she ■ is entitled to a judgment for a larger amount.

The undisputed evidence tends to show that plaintiff did support, maintain and educate these infant children, who were respectively two and ten years of age at the time she received them, from March 1, 1924, until July…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brush v. BlanchardIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Chilcott v. TrimbleNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Thorp v. BatemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Schnuckle v. BiermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hunt v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1841

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evink v. Pekin Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Schweitzer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  3. Watkins v. Medical & Dental Finance Bureau, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kippen v. KippenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Carle Clinic Ass'n v. SetenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API