Legal Opinion

Kippen v. Kippen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Plaintiff sued defendant for services rendered as governess, nurse and housekeeper for the three minor children of defendant. A jury returned a verdict finding the issues against defendant and assessing plaintiff’s damages at the sum of $1,500. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon the verdict.

Plaintiff’s verified statement of claim alleges: “1. That at the request of the defendant she rendered services as governess, nurse and housekeeper to the three minor children of the defendant, Josephine, Gerald and Edward, from November 15, 1931 to June 3,1935; that the sum of fifteen dollars…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Panther Creek Mines v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Faloon v. McIntyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Superior Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Peters v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. M. Martin Polokow Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evink v. Pekin Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Carle Clinic Ass'n v. SetenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Carle Clinic Ass'n v. SetenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API