Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Medical & Dental Finance Bureau, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1967No. 8313PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

Defendant appeals from judgment in the Superior Court of Maricopa County granting recovery for the plaintiff, Medical & Dental Finance Bureau, Inc., and against the defendant in the sum of $310.00 plus costs.

This action was brought in the lower court for the purpose of collecting dental fees in conjunction with services rendered to the defendant’s daughter by a Dr. Fuller. The right to collect such fees were assigned to the plaintiff.

The facts leading to the incurrence of the dental fees here in question are as follows. The defendant and his wife were divorced, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kriedo v. KriedoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Barrett v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hoard v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fennell v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Charbonneau v. NortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Division of Family Services v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous HusbandArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Division of Family Services v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API