Legal Opinion

Fiore v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.

The moving. defendants, Bay Bidge Sanitarium, Inc. and “Mary” Pratt, seek an order pursuant to CPLB 3124 to compel plaintiff to submit to a physical examination before a designated doctor; (b) to direct plaintiff to comply with the other provisions contained in the annexed notice; (c) that upon plaintiff’s noncompliance with the court’s mandate, her complaint, as to movants, be ordered stricken.

The action is to recover damages for alleged injuries resulting from the malpractice of the defendants.

The moving papers uncontrovertedly show that on July 28, 1965 defendants, pursuant to CPLB 3121,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kromanik v. TwissNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De Castro v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mackey v. Holy Family HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pipers v. RosenowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Scott v. BerryCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  5. Sommers v. Federation of Jewish PhilanthropiesNew York Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API