Legal Opinion

Kromanik v. Twiss

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHyman Korn, J.

The individual defendant moves for discovery and inspection of the plaintiff’s psychiatric record at Bellevue Hospital. By cross motion, the defendant hospital moves for the same relief. In opposition, the plaintiff avers that exchange of medical information is not provided for in malpractice cases by the rules of this court. The City of New York appears on behalf of Bellevue Hospital and seeks protection of the court if the motion is granted. While rule XI of the New York and Bronx Counties Supreme Court Buies provides for an exchange of medical information, except in malpractice cases, CPLB…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fiore v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. De Castro v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sharratt v. HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Sommers v. Federation of Jewish PhilanthropiesNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In re the Estate of De MaioNew York Surrogate's Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API