Legal Opinion

Mackey v. Holy Family Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

In this action for alleged malpractice defendant Pirudini moves for an order vacating plaintiff’s demand for a copy of the report by defendant’s examining physician.

Defendant, in his moving papers, asserts that the exchange of medical information is not provided for in malpractice cases (Special Rules of the Appellate Division, Second Department, part IV).

CPLR 3121 (subd. [b]), encompassing many more actions than did former section 306 of the Civil Practice Act, provides for the exchange of a “ detailed written report of the examining physician setting out his findings and conclusions ”. (See…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fiore v. Bay Ridge Sanitarium, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Castro v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pipers v. RosenowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Sommers v. Federation of Jewish PhilanthropiesNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Washington v. CuffaroNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API