State v. Superior Court, Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
Petitioner brought this special action to challenge the trial court’s order in a child molestation case concluding that the three-year-old victim is not competent to testify as a witness and that the victim’s out-of-court statements to others are inadmissible. The real party in interest, the defendant, was charged by indictment with one count of child molestation. The court’s order followed a hearing to determine the competence of the victim, defendant’s daughter, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4061, and the admissibility of her out-of-court statements under A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Eneas Lavern NickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- State v. ParrisWashington Supreme Court · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- John Doe, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.