Legal Opinion

Chandler v. City of Kokomo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1894No. 16,672PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

This proceeding was by the appellee, The City of Kokomo, for the annexation of certain unplatted territory lying contiguous to said city and owned *296by the appellants and others who are joined as appellees. On appeal from the order of annexation by the board of commissioners of Howard county, the venue was changed to the court below, where, upon a full hearing, said territory was again ordered annexed, and from this order the appellants have appealed to this court.

The first question presented by the assignments of error and argument of counsel is the sufficiency of the petition upon which the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Scraper v. PipesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Washington Ice Co. v. LayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Schmied v. KeeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. McCOY ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Trittipo v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Forsyth v. City of HammondCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Paul v. Town of WalkertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API