Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanyo Electric Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 5, 1981No. C.A.D. 1258; No. 80-34PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court (now the U.S. Court of International Trade), 84 Cust. Ct. 167, C.D. 4855, 496 F. Supp. 1311 (1980), sustaining the appellee’s claim that the imported merchandise in issue, known as a power failure light, was improperly classified as a flashlight under item 683.70 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) and was correctly classifiable as electrical articles, not specifically provided for, under item 688.40.* We affirm.

*15OPINION

We agree with the holding of the Court of International Trade that the imported…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sanyo Electric Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tomoegawa USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Carling Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. A & A International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. A & a Intern., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API