Legal Opinion
Entian v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance of Philadelphia
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided April 22, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchackno, J.
This action is brought to recover upon a policy of insurance issued by the defendant upon the life of Fred Berger. The plaintiff was named as the beneficiary. The application for the policy was dated November 28, 1932, and December 1, 1932.
The policy was dated December 2, 1932, but was not delivered until December 15, 1932. The insured died on March 1, 1934, at the Metropolitan Hospital, Welfare island, New York city, from pulmonary tuberculosis.
Defendant contends that the policy is void, because of untruthful statements of material facts made by the insured on his application for such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Klein v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Keck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Anderson v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Sparer v. Travelers Insurance of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirschner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Roth v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Weisbeck v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994