Roth v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.
This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The original affidavits of Drs. Hyman, Ryan and Atchley will be disregarded (see motion to strike out, decided simultaneously herewith, N. Y. L. J., July 7, 1944, p. 37, col. 6) and the revised affidavits of said physicians considered in their stead.
*614The defendant’s affidavits establish that the insured made misrepresentations in order to induce the defendant to issue its policy. Section 149 of the Insurance Law, enacted within the past few years (L. 1939, ch. 882), expressly provides (subd. 2) that “ No…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Saad v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Reznikoff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Acee v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Polachek v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greene v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1981