State v. Thornton
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion,
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Lawrence James Thornton, appeals from the judgment of the trial court challenging the imposition as a condition of his probation, inter alia, certain monetary special conditions. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly included, as special conditions of probation, (1) a condition ordering him to pay a lump sum of $5000 into a fund “that will reimburse the victim for any deductible from a health insurance policy or [for] any treatment or counseling the victim may require” and (2) a condition that he pay $1000 per year for the first ten years of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. AbrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. GroppiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. KlingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.