Legal Opinion

State v. Thornton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 21, 1999No. AC 18079PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

HENNESSY, J.

The defendant, Lawrence James Thornton, appeals from the judgment of the trial court challenging the imposition as a condition of his probation, inter alia, certain monetary special conditions. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly included, as special conditions of probation, (1) a condition ordering him to pay a lump sum of $5000 into a fund “that will reimburse the victim for any deductible from a health insurance policy or [for] any treatment or counseling the victim may require” and (2) a condition that he pay $1000 per year for the first ten years of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. AbrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. GroppiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. State v. KlingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API