Legal Opinion
State v. Klinger
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 7, 2007No. AC 26850PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The pro se defendant, Garry Klinger, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to vacate the conditions of his probation. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the state breached its plea agreement with him by improperly asking for the imposition of conditions of probation of which he had not been apprised at the time of the plea and to which he had not agreed, (2) the court improperly failed to apprise him of the conditions of probation at the time of the plea and (3) a certain condition of his probation was improper because it required him to pay…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Solano v. CalegariConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. LongoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.