Legal Opinion

In Re Felthoven

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1946No. Crim. 4041Published

1Opinion of the Court

75 Cal.App.2d 465 (1946)

In re HENRY LEE FELTHOVEN, on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 4041.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.

July 22, 1946.

Bernard Lawler for Petitioner.

Fred N. Howser, District Attorney, and Jere J. Sullivan, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

WOOD, J.

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. An order to show cause why petitioner should not be adjudged guilty of contempt of court for wilfully failing to comply with a pendente lite order of the superior court made on March 20, 1946, by which he was required to pay certain sums of money for the support of his wife…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Frowley v. Superior Court of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Groves v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. In Re FelthovenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API