Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reliance Life Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1941No. 4022Published

1DissentSutton, Justice

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion, and here state my reason for dissent.

The facts are, as indicated, agreed to and undisputed. It was agreed the policy was in full force and effect and that plaintiff was within all the provisions of the policy at the time of his injury and disability December 15, 1925; that he on that date sustained a total and presumably permanent disability which had continued from such date to the date of the trial and of the agreement, February 9, 1940.

The correctness of the trial court’s judgment and this appeal depend upon the construction of the disability…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Duncan v. MagetteTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. State Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. American Indemnity Co. v. Mexia Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API