United Mercury Mines Co. v. Pfost
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
This action involves the constitutionality of chapter 65 of the Session Laws of the First Extraordinary Session of 1935 (1935 Extra. Sess., p. 182). On application of the plaintiffs (respondents here), the trial court ordered an injunction against appellants, the commissioner of law enforcement and the attorney general, enjoining and restraining them from proceeding in any manner or form to enforce or execute the provisions of the said act, popularly known as the “Mine Tax Law.” Plaintiffs in their complaint set up a large number of objections to the act and urged the same as grounds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. BaldridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re Contempt Proceedings of BrainardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. AllmonIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Mills Novelty Co. v. DunbarIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Walling v. BownIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peck v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Hull v. CartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.