Legal Opinion

Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1996No. 21287Published

1Opinion of the Court

913 P.2d 1141 (1996)

128 Idaho 371

BOUNDARY BACKPACKERS, an unincorporated association; North Idaho Audubon Society, Inc., an Idaho corporation; Bonners Ferry Forest Watch, an unincorporated association; Jerry Pavia; Paul R. Sieracki; Will Venard; Jan Wathen; Allen H. Rose and Jan Rose, husband and wife; Laurel McGuire; Lew Langness and Linda Langness, husband and wife; John O'Connor; Shaela Conner; Cherie Bronstein; Robert Moir; David W. Bodner and Meeche Bodner, husband and wife; Dan J. Misciagna; Daniel Krmpotich and Michael S. Powers, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

BOUNDARY COUNTY, a governmental…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Silak; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Schroeder.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API