Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1972No. 21157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The defendant appeals from a conviction of burglary not in a dwelling. OBS 164.240. On appeal he contends (1) the evidence against him was not sufficient to present a jury question, and (2) that the court erred in its instructions to the jury.①

*325A La Grande jewelry store was burglarized between the time it closed on Friday, December 11, 1970, and opened on Monday, December 14, 1970. Various items of jewelry were stolen. The defendant and two other men, Luna and Lumpkins, were seen together in and near La Grande at various times and places both on the Friday before the burglary and during the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. TruxallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Shearer v. LantzOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API