Legal Opinion

Luros v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1968No. Nos. 18707-18711PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

The recurring problem of obscenity vel non is presented. The appeal arises from a criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461 and 1462, as amended (1964), for mailing and transporting “obscene” literature. Appellants are four corporations and their sole stockholder, Milton Luros. A jury trial was held in the Northern District of Iowa, Western Division, under the venue provision applicable to the above statutes, 18 U.S.C. § 3237 (1964).1 After a finding of guilty the trial court sentenced appellants Luros, Parliament News, Inc. and London Press, Inc. on eighteen counts; Sun…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Redrup v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Marvin Miller, Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publications v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Tollett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API