Legal Opinion
Zinni v. Royal Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 6, 1980No. 79-1114PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiff, Karen Zinni, brought this action against the defendants, Royal Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., and Ford Motor Company, for breach of a contract for the sale of an automobile. In its motion to dismiss, defendant Royal Lincoln-Mercury contended that (1) no contract existed because defendant did not accept plaintiff’s order to buy; and (2) if a contract exists, it is unenforceable under the Illinois statute of frauds (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 26, par. 2 — 201). The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss.
According to the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint, plaintiff visited…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Abbey Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Estate Stove Co. v. KenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
- Santucci Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Echo, Inc. v. Whitson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Beard Implement Co., Inc. v. KrusaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mike Schlemer, Inc. v. PulizosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994