Legal Opinion
Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1983No. 80-5629Published
1Opinion of the Court
703 F.2d 534
1983-1 Trade Cases 65,239, 35 UCC Rep.Serv. 1087
FOREMOST PRO COLOR, INC., a California corporation,
individually and on behalf of all other similarly
situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 80-5629.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 8, 1982.
Decided Feb. 23, 1983.
Robert C. Fortune, (argued), Downey, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Neil M. Soltman (argued), Philip F. Westbrook, Thomas M. McCoy, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.