Legal Opinion

Columbia Creosoting Co. v. Beard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1909No. 6,682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; Robert L. Mason, Judge. Action by Clarence M. Beard, as administrator of the estate of John B. Gordon, deceased, against the Columbia Creosoting Company and another. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $5,000, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRabb, J.

Appellant Columbia Creosoting Company is a corporation engaged in the business of treating railroad ties with creosote. Appellant Cravens was the superintendent, having in charge the directing of the work and workmen. The company had an extensive plant, which consisted of a yard, containing several acres of ground, traversed by numerous metal tracks, designed for trucks to run upon. In the yard there were also two large, steel structures in the form of tanks. These structures were provided with heavy iron doors, and were traversed by a track for the trucks to run in upon. The company also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CorpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Standard Steel Car Co. v. MartineczIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. National Motor Vehicle Co. v. PakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bennett v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. WassonOhio Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Standard Cement Co. v. MinorIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API