Legal Opinion
City of Kansas City v. Heather
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 2009No. WD 68653PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.
William Heather appeals his conviction of a municipal charge of harassment following a trial de novo. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction on the charge stated in the information. The judgment of conviction and sentence is vacated.
Background
William Heather was charged with harassment in violation of a Kansas City municipal ordinance. The “violation notice and information” charged that he intentionally made a telephone call to Kelly Lester 1 and “threatened] to commit a felony, to wit, stated he would kill her,” in order to harass,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kansas City v. LaRoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Strode v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. GheenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. GonzalezMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- City of Kansas City v. McGaryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brunner v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- City of Creve Coeur v. NottebrokMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- CITY OF DEXTER v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri v. Richard KuntzeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Opinion No. (2011), Missouri Attorney General Reports2011