Legal Opinion

City of Cape Girardeau, Missouri v. Richard Kuntze

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 2016No. ED103593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

Richard Kuntze (Appellant) appeals the judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of the offense of creating a public nuisance, in violation of an ordinance of the City of Cape Girardeau (City). Appellant argues that the ordinance is vague and therefore the City failed to meet its burden of proof. Appellant also argues the ordinance is unconstitutional. We affirm.

Background

On January 14, 2014, an officer with the Cape Girardeau Police Department observed a green Jeep with two flat tires parked in the driveway of Appellant’s property. The tags on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weinschenk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Consumer Contact Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Etling v. Westport Heating & Cooling Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. Cook v. SaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Moynihan v. GunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Life Evangelistic Ctr. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Conley v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API