Legal Opinion

Booker v. Porth

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1968No. 68SC124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

In this case we will proceed to the merits of the appeal without comment upon the very serious questions of whether plaintiff’s case on appeal was served upon defendant in time, and whether plaintiff’s record on appeal was docketed in this Court within the time prescribed by our rules.

It is abundantly clear from a reading of the complaint that plaintiff seeks by this action to recover personal judgment against the defendants for the payment of money. In his “Notice of Lis Pendens” plaintiff alleges: “The object of said action is to recover upon an express contract for payment of attorney’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Bailey v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Rich v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Cook v. . BradsherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilley v. ShoffnerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  2. Pegram v. TOMRICH CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API