Legal Opinion

Pegram v. TOMRICH CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1969No. 6914SC175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Plaintiff appellant’s sole assignment of error is to entry of the order vacating his notice of lis pendens. In this State the com mon law rule of lis pendens has been replaced by statute, G.S. 1-116 to G.S. 1-120.1; Cutter v. Realty Co., 265 N.C. 664, 144 S.E. 2d 882. The applicable statute, G.S. 1-116(a), describes three types of action in which a notice of pending litigation may be filed:

“(1) Actions affecting title to real property;
“(2) Actions to foreclose any mortgage or deed of trust or to enforce any lien on real property; and
“(3) Actions in which any order of attachment is issued and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Brogden v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Jones v. Atlantic & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Booker v. PorthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Doby v. LowderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Cap Care Group, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Baxter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. George v. Administrative Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API