Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Newell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 13, 1971PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
This was an action for damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by Carl F. Johnson, Jr., the plaintiff’s intestate, 1 by virtue of an accident which occurred on October 7, 1961, when the late Carl F. Johnson, Jr., was driving his automobile on Connecticut route 7 in the vicinity of Cornwall Bridge, Kent. The first count of the complaint, alleging a breach of warranty, was directed against the defendant, John Newell, doing business as Newell’s Atlantic Service Station, who was engaged in selling “new recapped tires” at retail. The second count of the complaint, also…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carney v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Sydleman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Pelletier v. BilbilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. MullingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.