State v. Bolling
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee. Ctjbiam,
The charge of the court is not brought forward.
The sole assignment of error argued in the defendant’s brief is the failure of the trial court to grant his motion for judgment of nonsuit aptly made.
The evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the State, is sufficient in our opinion to carry the ease to the jury. S. v. Smith, ante, 99, 81 S.E. 2d 263; S. v. Holbrook, 228 N.C. 620, 46 S.E. 2d 843; Commonwealth v. Lyseth, 250 Mass. 555, 146 N.E. 18; S. v. De Hart, 3 N.J., Misc. Reports 71, 129 A. 427.
The defendant says in his brief the case of Bland v. City of Richmond,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Commonwealth v. LysethMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Bland v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- State v. DeHartPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1925
- State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948