Legal Opinion

State v. . Holbrook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendant demurred to the evidence in both cases and assigns error in the refusal of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

The evidence offered at the trial tended to show that on the occasion alleged the automobile which defendant was driving on Highway 67 between Booneville and East Bend struck the rear of another automobile proceeding in same direction. Considerable injury was done to the front of defendant’s car and to the rear of the other. The radiator of defendant’s car was torn up and pushed back against the fan. The ear in front was traveling on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. State v. . CodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State v. . FlinchemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PeedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. State v. VanhoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. BollingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API